The Latest in Celebrity Fashion, Beauty and Fitness

13 Responses

1. Celebrity Fashion July 21st, 2009 at 3:44 pm

   Eva Longoria size 24??? damn..

2. vanessa November 6th, 2009 at 11:12 am

   There is NO way that Kim Kardashian and Jennifer Anniston wear the same size jeans!!! LMAO! And no way that Jennifer Love Hewitt may be a size two on top but her apple bottom is not.

3. Whatsmysize.com November 29th, 2009 at 4:40 pm

   Whatsmysize.com concurs that on average (the mainly Brits on our site) are a size twelve.

   What I want know is where do these celebs buy a size 0 ? Most stores stock slightly larger sizes not smaller and brands like ted baker have their own size numbering system. Maybe shopping in LA is very different to NyC or London ?

4. Naomi January 18th, 2010 at 10:41 am

   I disagree with you Vanessa, Kim and Jennifer can wear the same size because they both are not the same height, most women Kim’s height are usually size 0 to 2; btw Kim has a youtube video of her trying on numerous pairs of size 27 jeans. I wrote this not to be rude but just wanted to prove a point

5. lexi February 2nd, 2010 at 8:28 pm

   There is no way jessica simpson is anything smaller than a 6.

6. Catherine April 28th, 2010 at 5:52 pm

   I think someones pulling our leg on most of these. Kim K’s waist may be a 26 but her hips couldn’t be. I saw her standing sideways and she’s got quite a caboose. Same with Jessica (though I think she’s more feminine with the wight than she was when she looked like a pencil), thought she had a boob job after seeing her on Ellen’s today, but after looking at old photos, she’s always been “bountiful” and the added weight would make sense. Mariah Carey’s number is an outrageous lie, if not, I want to get my jeans at the same place she does. Her butt’s gotta be close to the same size as mine and I’m a 10-12 (smaller waist, bigger behind). The only thing that may make a difference is height, and a lot of these women are short (I’m 5′4″), so there’s just NO way that these 3 are size 4/6. (Maybe someone’s changing out their tags to make them feel better…)

7. Amanda May 18th, 2010 at 9:16 am

   Kim’s is right u measure by waist not butt, she buys stretch jeans, has jeans made. Her behind is not as big as it may look. There are things she does to accommodate for it, it does not affect her waist size.

8. Amanda May 18th, 2010 at 9:20 am

   On another note the more expensive clothes are the smaller the size. When i buy a dress from a store in the mall i wear a 3 but if i buy a dress from BCBG I wear a 0.

   Also Stores do not stock more of larger sizes. I have worked retail in quite a few places, we carried the same amount of 0’s as 13’s. The sizes we carried the most of were 3-6’s

9. AmazonkA June 1st, 2010 at 7:58 am

   Kim’s gotta be at least AT LEAST size 12, and jeans size 13!!! She’s got the hugest ass I’ve ever seen… ROFL at looking at these invented numbers xD I mean it’s so obvious that Kim, Mariah Carey and J. Lo wear much MUCH bigger sizes than these… I don’t know why don’t they admit it, cuz it’s so obvious!

10. AmazonkA June 1st, 2010 at 7:58 am

    * jeans size 32

11. Couture July 25th, 2010 at 12:51 am

    Bare in mind that all these actresses are all different heights, weights and builds. For instance Kim K and Eva Longoria are both 5′2 but weigh differently. Plus you have to look at the frames of the girls. Mariah Carey for instance is not a petite girl, she is average in build. So a size 29 would fit and look differently on her than someone who is more petite and shorter.

    Just look at Christina Ricci she is a size 0, but she is 5′1. Which looks healthy on her. So really going by size isn’t fair for these actresses, it’s all about weight, their build and being healthy.

12. sweet girl July 29th, 2010 at 3:42 pm

    Kim K is 5” tall and not 5.2”

13. Shorty15 August 26th, 2010 at 9:53 pm

    Wow, Halle’s like the perfect size, 4. Not too skinny not too big, though I’d go for like a 6.

Comments